> > Hungary's vote on the International Criminal Court: An act of sovereignty

Hungary's vote on the International Criminal Court: An act of sovereignty

Image of the Hungarian vote on the International Criminal Court

Matteo Salvini comments on the Hungarian Parliament's decision with words of support.

The context of the Hungarian decision

The recent vote by the Hungarian Parliament, which approved the withdrawal from the International Criminal Court (ICC), has sparked heated debate both nationally and internationally. This choice, defined by many as an act of sovereignty, is part of a broader context of tensions between Hungary and the European institutions.

Viktor Orbán's government has often criticized the ICC, accusing it of being politicized and of not respecting the sovereignty of member states.

Political reactions in Italy

Matteo Salvini, leader of the League, expressed his support for the Hungarian decision in a post on X, stressing the importance of “choices of justice and freedom”. This position reflects a growing alliance among right-wing parties in Europe, which see national sovereignty as a fundamental value to be defended. Salvini's reaction is emblematically representative of a sentiment shared by many European leaders who oppose greater European integration and a supranational legal system.

Implications for the European Union

Hungary's withdrawal from the ICC could have significant consequences for the European Union. On the one hand, it could incentivize other Member States to follow Budapest's example, thus undermining the Court's authority and the principle of international justice. On the other hand, it could lead to greater polarization within the EU, with Eastern countries increasingly distancing themselves from common norms. This raises questions about the Union's ability to maintain a united front on issues of justice and human rights.