Lucrezia Ciotti Roberta's sudden farewell Bruzzone a 14 She shed light on the tensions behind the scenes of talk shows, revealing how professional differences and personal conflicts can quickly turn into permanent rifts. Between absences, clashes, and social media posts, the criminologist has charted a new course in her television career, aiming for a more independent presence and one consistent with her own choices.
Roberta Bruzzone and the future of television at RAI
Despite the farewell to 14, Roberta Bruzzone does not abandon television: she returns to collaborate with Alberto Matano on Live Life on Rai 1, commenting on the main news stories, and maintains command of In the mind of Narcissus, confirmed for another two seasons on RaiPlay and in late evening on Rai 2. As the criminologist explained to her followers: “Come on, it won't be a problem, overcoming the feeling of emptiness that my absence leaves".
The decision to leave the Rai2 program would follow not only the disagreements with Milo Infante, but also the disagreement over the presence of a guest deemed unwelcome. His exit from 14 It seems to mark the beginning of a more autonomous phase of his career, oriented towards an independent media presence consistent with his own beliefs: “I am a consistent person and consistency is non-negotiable”, he wrote, reiterating his choice of priorities and professional autonomy.
Roberta Bruzzone leaves Ore 14, why she's out: the truth
It all started with a heated confrontation with Milo Infante, an episode that had already revealed significant differences. The absence of the criminologist In the evening edition of the program and a subsequent social media post, perceived as a manifesto of independence, confirmed the irreversibility of the separation. As Bruzzone herself wrote: "I'm glad my absence is felt.”, underlining a detachment that is not only professional, but also personal.
The mystery of Roberta Bruzzone's sudden exit from 14 has taken on increasingly clear contours, thanks to a post shared on social media by the person directly involved.
"The versions provided by “Ore 14” about an alleged negotiation, my alleged veto on the times or even my request to be invited “only in the afternoon” are ttotally false, devoid of any foundation and denied by the facts and documents in my possession. If anything, that was a request made by one of the program managers...certainly not by me, in an attempt to salvage what could be salvaged.
On my part, there has never been any negotiation.
I've never opened one.
I never wanted one.
And I've never had any interest in having any.
Any narrative other than this is — simply — false.”.
As reported by Fanpage, at the basis of the television divorce there would have been the criminologist's will to exclude Umberto Brindani, director of People, from the program table. The request, deemed unacceptable by the editorial staff, would have created irreparable tensions.A broadcast is not a taxi in which a person decides what and who to talk to." , someone who witnessed the discussions in the newsroom reportedly observed. Bruzzone then proposed an alternative solution: covering the Garlasco case only in the afternoon edition, thus avoiding the meeting with Brindani. The editorial staff's response was clear.
Despite this, Bruzzone wanted to clarify on social media that this reconstruction does not correspond to the reality of the facts:
"I would like to say that this distorted narrative surprises me.…but, in all honesty, that's not the case, and this scenario reinforces the wisdom of my decision.
As far as I'm concerned, the matter is very simple: no negotiations, no requests, no vetoes. Just lies that can easily be debunked from the documents."