Notizie.it editorial team Topics Covered
As Denmark takes over the presidency of the Council of the European Union, it faces significant challenges. It wants to put climate change at the centre of the European debate, but the question is: how much can it really influence the debate in a political context where competitiveness seems to prevail over carbon reduction? Denmark, which recently introduced a tax on agricultural emissions, aims to use its experience to lead Europe towards more sustainable practices.
But will it be enough?
A complex political landscape
The Danish presidency comes at a critical time, coinciding with a heated debate about the future of agriculture in Europe. Despite high ambitions, the Danish government faces a reality where most EU members are sceptical about tough climate measures. Tensions over farmers’ protests and the European Parliament’s recent shift to the right raise questions about Denmark’s ability to push forward a sustainability agenda. Anyone who has launched a product knows that Political challenges can be as treacherous as market difficulties.
Green Transition Minister Jeppe Bruus has argued that it is possible to simultaneously tackle the climate and biodiversity crises, while also creating jobs and growth. However, the rhetoric and reality of European agricultural policies are stark. Denmark has imposed a tax on agricultural emissions, something that even climate-leading nations like New Zealand have failed to achieve. This was achieved through a tripartite agreement involving farmers, the government and environmental groups, but replicating such success at the European level will prove a daunting task.
The Challenges of the Green Tripartite Agreement
The Danish Green Tripartite Agreement plans to impose a tax on livestock emissions starting in 2030, with the aim of reinvesting the proceeds in green initiatives and supporting farmers. However, the taxation mechanism is not without criticism. Many experts argue that the tax starts at too low a level to generate systemic changes in the agricultural sector. For example, in 2030, the tax will be 120 Danish kroner (about 16 euros) per tonne, which is significantly lower than the tax applied to industry. Isn't it time to ask ourselves if this is really the right path?
Furthermore, the reliance on voluntary measures and untested technologies, such as biochar and methane inhibitors, raises further doubts about the plan’s effectiveness. Denmark will face increasing domestic pressure, as right-wing parties criticize the tax system, fearing negative impacts on jobs and production. This raises questions about Denmark’s ability to serve as a leader in the European agricultural landscape, especially if its credibility continues to be questioned.
Lessons and future prospects
Danish experiences offer valuable insights for founders and product managers in the agricultural and environmental sectors. The key to success lies in the ability to build strong alliances and engage in open dialogues, elements that were the basis of the Green Tripartite Agreement. However, it is crucial that business leaders do not lose sight of the bigger picture and the European political dynamics that influence decisions. The growth data tells a different story: Denmark may not be able to radically change European agricultural policies, but it can certainly help keep the discussion on sustainability alive.
For founders, the important thing is to learn to navigate turbulent political waters, adapting their strategies to address resistance and embrace opportunities. Sustainability must be seen not just as a goal, but as an opportunity for innovation and economic growth, something that could prove vital for the future of the European agricultural sector.